Posted Mar 26, 2008 at 10:07PM by Ryan C.
Listed in:
Blu-ray,
Opinions and Analysis
Tags:
Sony
Ó
|
With the format war over and done with as far as HD-DVD is concerned, analysts are now forming their own opinion about what will play out in the next couple of months, in terms of technology adoption and home penetration. Through extensive research and studies, they have concluded that at least 29.4 million homes will have a Blu-ray player by the end of 2009, and 132 million more will be enjoying movies at Blu-ray definition in 2012. Wow. Here's a direct quote from one of the analysts, David Mercer: HD-DVD’s withdrawal leaves the way open for Blu-ray to become a major revenue earner for technology vendors and content owners alike. The 265 million homes that will own an HDTV by 2012, and Hollywood’s need for a new growth engine, represent huge incentives for the industry to coordinate marketing activities and demonstrate unified support for the successor to DVD. Well, that certainly sounds conclusive. And when you figure in more stats from the Strategy Analytics Report, it definitely makes sense - these stats being that the global sales of Blu-ray devices will reach 18.8 million units in 2008 (that includes 4 million stand-alone players, 13 million consoles and nearly 2 million PCs). Four years after, the sales would have ballooned to 57.4 million units, with Europe being the largest consumer, garnering more than 26 million units. While we can certainly agree with the deal that HD-DVD backing out means more business for Blu-ray, we also can't help but think that it could be a bit optimistic. After all, just how much of high-definition do you really want in a movie? And there's the deal with movies being meant to be watched in a cinema, with friends and family - did that get figured out in the Strategy Analytics Report? We may never know, but one thing's clear: Sony's about to make a huge killing. Updates as we get them. |
|
|
[Via Sys-Con]
Permalink |
Email this |
Linking Blogs
| Digg It!
Bookmark / Find this article on: |
|
7 Comments
|
» i can personally
attest that once you go Blu it's hard to go back... i don't care about the price difference between Blu Ray and DVD.... DVD just doesn't satisfy me anymore.
Currently have 67 Blu Ray movies (make it 69 if you count the three disks of Tudors as one each, it's a box set).
to the future Blu Ray buyers, when you've matched it up with ur new HDTVs it's going to be a hell of an experience.
can't wait for the coming BDLive compatible movies.
attest that once you go Blu it's hard to go back... i don't care about the price difference between Blu Ray and DVD.... DVD just doesn't satisfy me anymore.
Currently have 67 Blu Ray movies (make it 69 if you count the three disks of Tudors as one each, it's a box set).
to the future Blu Ray buyers, when you've matched it up with ur new HDTVs it's going to be a hell of an experience.
can't wait for the coming BDLive compatible movies.
» Blu or Bust
Agreed, Quixand. Once you see true HD programs (the compression on TV broadcasts is quite a bit sloppy to really say "that's all HD is") on Blu-ray disc, you don't want to continue investing in DVD's. And a major growth like this article predicts only ensures that we won't have to keep 'skimping on content' (ie: not buying on DVD or BD, because a title isn't released on BD yet), because the market will be large enough even for obscure titles to be profitable.
Agreed, Quixand. Once you see true HD programs (the compression on TV broadcasts is quite a bit sloppy to really say "that's all HD is") on Blu-ray disc, you don't want to continue investing in DVD's. And a major growth like this article predicts only ensures that we won't have to keep 'skimping on content' (ie: not buying on DVD or BD, because a title isn't released on BD yet), because the market will be large enough even for obscure titles to be profitable.
» WTF!?!?!?!?!
You're going to have a hard time convincing people with just the info you gave.
As good as HD is compared to DVD the average person won't see a difference on a small screen.
DVD does look good, there's no doubt about that. Especially on a small screen and especially on a tube.
With that said, raise your hand if for the past 13 years you've been using a large screen? Sure DVD is still leaps and bounds better then VHS however even DVD looks like crap and it looked like crap 13 years ago on large screens.
Now that large screens are the norm along with the norm being LCD, HD is more a necessity. But it's only needed for those that use a large format screen. For everyone else it's just another luxury.
You're going to have a hard time convincing people with just the info you gave.
As good as HD is compared to DVD the average person won't see a difference on a small screen.
DVD does look good, there's no doubt about that. Especially on a small screen and especially on a tube.
With that said, raise your hand if for the past 13 years you've been using a large screen? Sure DVD is still leaps and bounds better then VHS however even DVD looks like crap and it looked like crap 13 years ago on large screens.
Now that large screens are the norm along with the norm being LCD, HD is more a necessity. But it's only needed for those that use a large format screen. For everyone else it's just another luxury.
» ISO yes, agreed but
History, in technology as far as we are concerned has taught as something.
As years go by and technology develops, so do our needs. From the radio to the B+W tv%u2019s with no sound to B+W tv%u2019 s with sound to colour tv%u2019s and so on and so forth.
Today is the plasmas and LCDs tomorrow will be OLED , HD tech in general and god knows what else in the future.
I agree with you on the fact that we don%u2019t actualy need them as if they are obligatory upgrades, as if our existing technology would sease to function, no, but they have become a natural progressing necessity through the years in all societies that are depended in ever advancing technology, just like formats.
8 years ago came the DVD, today its DVD still but history is repeating its self, thus the more advance will replace it and that%u2019s Blu-ray.
Tomorrow its Internet downloadable content and so forth (if the average download speeds ever break their sluggish and unstable state).
Personally, I like Blu-ray but its current price (average 18 pounds for each disc here in the UK) its way to high considering the fact that I could get the same movie on dvd for less than half and have my ps3 upscale it to HD rez (even if it doesn%u2019t get close to the quality of Blu-ray).
I think I will wait for the prices to go down and then I will say goodbye to the old champ the DVD just like our seemingly wealthy friend from the land down under, Quixand.
History, in technology as far as we are concerned has taught as something.
As years go by and technology develops, so do our needs. From the radio to the B+W tv%u2019s with no sound to B+W tv%u2019 s with sound to colour tv%u2019s and so on and so forth.
Today is the plasmas and LCDs tomorrow will be OLED , HD tech in general and god knows what else in the future.
I agree with you on the fact that we don%u2019t actualy need them as if they are obligatory upgrades, as if our existing technology would sease to function, no, but they have become a natural progressing necessity through the years in all societies that are depended in ever advancing technology, just like formats.
8 years ago came the DVD, today its DVD still but history is repeating its self, thus the more advance will replace it and that%u2019s Blu-ray.
Tomorrow its Internet downloadable content and so forth (if the average download speeds ever break their sluggish and unstable state).
Personally, I like Blu-ray but its current price (average 18 pounds for each disc here in the UK) its way to high considering the fact that I could get the same movie on dvd for less than half and have my ps3 upscale it to HD rez (even if it doesn%u2019t get close to the quality of Blu-ray).
I think I will wait for the prices to go down and then I will say goodbye to the old champ the DVD just like our seemingly wealthy friend from the land down under, Quixand.
» far from wealthy my friend
and haven't turned my back totally on dvd cause some things you just can't get on Blu Ray.
like my complete collection of Alias and Smallville which are on DVD, i do watch it from my PS3 to get upscaled as my dvd player is old school...
Iso you have to realize buddy that there is a reason why they tagged the Blu Ray to HDTV adoption on the article.... and i quote "The 265 million homes that will own an HDTV by 2012"... making it a huge basis for the forecast...
and haven't turned my back totally on dvd cause some things you just can't get on Blu Ray.
like my complete collection of Alias and Smallville which are on DVD, i do watch it from my PS3 to get upscaled as my dvd player is old school...
Iso you have to realize buddy that there is a reason why they tagged the Blu Ray to HDTV adoption on the article.... and i quote "The 265 million homes that will own an HDTV by 2012"... making it a huge basis for the forecast...
» WTF!?!?!?!?!
"agree with you on the fact that we don%u2019t actualy need them as if they are obligatory upgrades"
I didn't say that, exactly. I said that large screen owners DO NEED them (additionally) if they want AT LEAST TV quality images.
I also said they'll have a hard time convincing people of smaller format TVs. The reason being, on a smaller format TV 720 and 1080 is indistinguishable to the majority. Further more, the difference between DVD and HDDVD on a smaller TV doesn't justify the $400+ player or the additional cost of the discs to many.
HDDVD as with all other technological advances is most certainly needed and welcomed. Otherwise one could argue we didn't need VHS to begin with. At first people regarded VHS as a total waste of money. Since then home videos have exploded and CHANGED LIVES. In the end (or much later) it's all for the better,
"Iso you have to realize buddy that there is a reason why they....."
The basis of the comments was to sell BR based on looks. There is still a qualifying in home factor to first overcome. Which is why I said:
"You're going to have a hard time convincing people with just the info you gave."
I am well aware of HD TV statistics however you also need to address size, that was my point. Most people with an small HDTV are perfectly happy with DVD. So the "265" statistic alone is worthless.
"agree with you on the fact that we don%u2019t actualy need them as if they are obligatory upgrades"
I didn't say that, exactly. I said that large screen owners DO NEED them (additionally) if they want AT LEAST TV quality images.
I also said they'll have a hard time convincing people of smaller format TVs. The reason being, on a smaller format TV 720 and 1080 is indistinguishable to the majority. Further more, the difference between DVD and HDDVD on a smaller TV doesn't justify the $400+ player or the additional cost of the discs to many.
HDDVD as with all other technological advances is most certainly needed and welcomed. Otherwise one could argue we didn't need VHS to begin with. At first people regarded VHS as a total waste of money. Since then home videos have exploded and CHANGED LIVES. In the end (or much later) it's all for the better,
"Iso you have to realize buddy that there is a reason why they....."
The basis of the comments was to sell BR based on looks. There is still a qualifying in home factor to first overcome. Which is why I said:
"You're going to have a hard time convincing people with just the info you gave."
I am well aware of HD TV statistics however you also need to address size, that was my point. Most people with an small HDTV are perfectly happy with DVD. So the "265" statistic alone is worthless.
» Nice.
I hope at least 20 Million of those are PS3's
I hope at least 20 Million of those are PS3's
|
QJ.NET Blog Network |
|
| MyQJ | Feed / PDA |
| MyQJ | RSS / PDA |
| Blog of Blogs | Feed / PDA |
| QJ.NET | RSS / PDA |
| Gaming Consoles | Feed / PDA |
| Nintendo DS | RSS / PDA |
| PlayStation 3 | RSS / PDA |
| PSP Updates | RSS / PDA |
| Wii | RSS / PDA |
| Xbox 360 | RSS / PDA |
| PC Gaming | Feed / PDA |
| Age of Conan | RSS / PDA |
| Games for Windows | RSS / PDA |
| MMORPG | RSS / PDA |
| Tabula Rasa | RSS / PDA |
| World of Warcraft | RSS / PDA |
| Science | Feed / PDA |
| Science | RSS / PDA |
| Technology | Feed / PDA |
| Apple | RSS / PDA |
| Gadgets | RSS / PDA |
| Mobile | RSS / PDA |
| Photography | RSS / PDA |
User Favorites - July
| Most Commented | |
| (6) | |
| (5) | |
| (2) | |
| (2) | |
| (1) | |
| (1) | |
| (1) | |
| (1) | |
| (1) | |
User Favorites - July
Blu-ray
(364)Communication
(73)Computing
(309)Deals
(41)Displays
(192)Energy
(87)GPS
(60)HD-DVD
(191)HDTV
(87)Health and Fitness
(103)Home Entertainment
(360)Household
(201)Internet
(75)Medical
(39)Memory
(48)MiniDisc
(4)Misc. Gadgets
(1032)Misc. Storage Media
(116)MP3 Players
(231)News
(650)Opinions and Analysis
(51)Portable Audio
(216)Portable Video
(189)Robots
(207)Security
(71)Site News
(27)Toys
(66)Transportation
(180)USB
(100)Wearables
(120)Wireless
(95)
Archives
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006



